I have a very grim out look on writing, not defeatist, mind you, but my aim is to understand what I do which is probably part of the problem. It’s an impossibility, you can’t understand how your mind works, you can only analyse other’s work and hope that their work will rub off on you somehow.
Writing gives you a plethora of problems if you think of it as problems. And really, all you can do is ask the questions and hope they’ll have answers eventually, you can’t figure it out, not if you’re like me.
And that’s not even the end of it. The answers will evolve and merge and be consumed by other questions until you have a grey brownish blob instead of the colorful puzzle that you had in your mind. And you know what? It’s beautiful because it’s real, it’s not a fantasy in your head.
It’s important that you keep trying but also know when to stop. There are pitfalls, unfortunately, and although you can dig yourself out of them, it’s probably better to just climb out, but what’s the fun in that? We like challenges, that’s part of the reason why we became writers, right?
All these ‘problems’ are compounded a thousandfold when you try to tackle longer works. It still boggles my mind that anyone could casually approach a story and believe they’ll have a finished book by the end of it, because of course the book is never good enough. The amount of editing is staggering! It’s not fun, at least it’s exhausting and you’ll run out of steam eventually, if you’re anything like me, you enjoy the discovery, editing for others to enjoy is secondary.
Is it satisfying finishing a manuscript? I wouldn’t know, I’m just looking forward to get it off my hands and start the new project, naively heading into the mist hoping the results will be different next time and you know what? I’m sure they will, because writing hardness you, you do understand more but every new project is a different beast and you better handle it with care unless you want to come out of it with half a mind.